I suppose I jumped onto the Freudian bandwagon without
thinking twice when I was younger. And now I’m stuck with this odd little
dilemma. What should we make of “parent bashing” (as Lilienfeld likes to say)?
Was he completely wrong? I think we should always stand on centre ground. It’s
a big cliché but we must listen to all sides before coming to a judgement –
yes, even to people who commune with sagacious beings in Mars.
I don’t think we
should ignore the effects of parenting on children. I think that is still
important. In “Unstrange Minds” by Grinker, he describes the experiments by
Harlow with a certain distaste (pointedly noting that the experiments bordered on
animal cruelty). In brief, Harlow studied the effects that abnormal mothering
can have on baby rhesus monkeys. He replaced the mother with mechanical monkeys
made of wire, cloth, with and without milk bottles etc. His results showed that
monkeys deprived of their mothers were emotionally disturbed.
Now, does this
actually lend proof to Freudian ideas, as Grinker claims it did? Does it support the idea that bad
mothering can cause crazy children? Yes and no. I think we should look at this
clearly. What Harlow did was to provide a very distressing upbringing
environment to the baby monkey. The baby has more or less been orphaned. So, I
think parents who don’t provide the basic necessities and at least some sort of
attention, and who abuse their children will increase the chances of emotional
and psychological problems.
But, I think the effects will be small beyond such
extreme conditions. Whether your dad was stricter than usual, or your mum was
more controlling. I don’t think these are the causes for psychopathologies. But
they will probably have some sorta effect on the person as a whole. Take for
example a series of experiments by Meaney and colleagues. They basically
compared the difference between rat mothers that gave high and low levels of licking,
grooming and arched-back nursing (LG-ABN) to their pups. What they found was
that the children of rat mothers which gave low levels of LG-ABN showed higher
stress reactivity. There is a lot more to this series of experiments and its
implications are many. However, for the purpose of this topic, suffice to say
that the behaviour of parents does affect the behaviour of their children. But,
from these studies, it seems that the effect is not enough to account for huge
modifications in personality, and certainly not enough for pathologies as the
offspring of low LG-ABN mothers still exhibited normal behaviour.
So, just to
summarise: in my opinion, children brought up in terrible conditions may turn out to be psychopathological (note that they are at higher
risk and not guaranteed to be dysfunctional), but other less extreme conditions
(e.g. when the child begins toilet training, when they start sleeping alone
etc.) will probably not push a person over the edge.
Sorry Frasier! But Freud’s out the window for me.
But I still think he's cool.


No comments:
Post a Comment